Chart of Accounts
Finance & AccountingA chart of accounts (COA) is the organized listing of all accounts used by an organization to record financial transactions, typically structured by account type (assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, expenses) with unique identifiers and descriptions.
What Is a Chart of Accounts?
A chart of accounts (COA) is the complete listing of every account used to record financial transactions in an organization’s general ledger. It serves as the foundation for all financial reporting, providing the structure that determines how transactions are categorized and how financial statements are organized.
A well-designed chart of accounts:
- Organizes accounts logically by type and function
- Uses consistent numbering conventions
- Supports required financial reporting
- Enables meaningful management analysis
- Scales as the business grows
Chart of Accounts Structure
Account Types
Accounts are typically organized into five main categories:
Assets (1000-1999) What the company owns:
- Cash and equivalents
- Accounts receivable
- Inventory
- Fixed assets
- Intangible assets
Liabilities (2000-2999) What the company owes:
- Accounts payable
- Accrued expenses
- Notes payable
- Long-term debt
Equity (3000-3999) Owners’ stake in the business:
- Common stock
- Retained earnings
- Additional paid-in capital
Revenue (4000-4999) Income from operations:
- Product revenue
- Service revenue
- Other income
Expenses (5000-9999) Costs of doing business:
- Cost of goods sold
- Operating expenses
- Interest expense
- Taxes
Account Numbering
Typical numbering conventions:
1100 - Cash
1200 - Accounts Receivable
1300 - Inventory
2100 - Accounts Payable
4100 - Product Revenue
5100 - Cost of Goods Sold
6100 - Salaries Expense
Numbering should allow for:
- Logical grouping of related accounts
- Room for new accounts without renumbering
- Consistent structure across entities
Chart of Accounts Best Practices
Keep It Simple
- Start with fewer accounts; add as needed
- Avoid overly granular accounts that rarely get used
- Use dimensions/segments for detailed tracking instead of separate accounts
Think About Reporting
- Structure supports required financial statements
- Enables management reporting needs
- Allows benchmarking against industry standards
Plan for Growth
- Leave gaps in numbering for future accounts
- Design for potential new entities or divisions
- Consider multi-currency requirements
Maintain Consistency
- Standardize across entities where possible
- Use consistent naming conventions
- Document account purposes and usage rules
Chart of Accounts vs. Dimensions
Modern accounting systems use both accounts and dimensions:
Accounts: What type of transaction (revenue, expense, asset)
Dimensions: Additional categorization (department, location, project, customer)
Instead of creating separate accounts like:
- Sales - East Region
- Sales - West Region
- Sales - Central Region
Use one Sales account with a Region dimension:
- Sales + Region: East
- Sales + Region: West
- Sales + Region: Central
This approach:
- Reduces account proliferation
- Enables flexible analysis
- Simplifies maintenance
Common COA Challenges
Over-complexity: Too many accounts making data entry and reporting difficult
Inconsistency: Different structures across entities preventing consolidation
Inflexibility: Design that can’t accommodate business changes
Poor documentation: Unclear account purposes leading to miscoding
Mapping difficulties: Hard to map to external reporting requirements
Multi-Entity Chart of Accounts
Organizations with multiple entities must decide:
Standardized COA: All entities use the same chart
- Pros: Easy consolidation, consistent reporting
- Cons: May not fit local requirements
Localized COA with mapping: Entities use local charts that map to corporate
- Pros: Flexibility for local needs
- Cons: Mapping maintenance required
Hybrid approach: Core accounts standardized, local accounts for specific needs
- Pros: Balance of consistency and flexibility
- Cons: Requires clear governance
How Go Fig Works with Charts of Accounts
Go Fig connects to your existing chart of accounts regardless of structure:
Multi-system mapping: Map accounts from different ERPs to a unified structure
Semantic layer: Define metrics that work across different COA structures
Consolidation: Automatically map and consolidate diverse charts of accounts
Reporting flexibility: Generate reports using any account grouping or hierarchy
Account analysis: Identify unused accounts, inconsistent coding, and optimization opportunities
More Finance & Accounting Terms
Budget vs Actual
Budget vs actual (BvA) analysis compares planned financial performance to actual results, identifyin...
Learn more →Accounts Payable
Accounts payable (AP) represents money owed by a company to its suppliers and vendors for goods or s...
Learn more →Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable (AR) represents money owed to a company by its customers for goods or services d...
Learn more →Put Chart of Accounts Into Practice
Go Fig helps finance teams implement these concepts without massive IT projects. See how we can help.
Request a Demo